2007 Ground Water Summit

Monday, April 30, 2007 : 2:20 p.m.

From the Gulf Coast to the Pacific Coast : Is there El Camino Real to Quantifying Ground Water?

Rima Petrossian, Texas Water Development Board

 

 

 

Each state's water resources policy developed depending upon distinct circumstances not necessarily related to the science or engineering of calculating resource availability. Around a hundred years ago quantifying groundwater resources in the United States was usually not a concern in most states. If it was, the responsibility was placed in the hands of engineers and scientists working for the governing state agency. In Texas, that responsibility has evolved to rest in the hands of local elected officials. Texas' current approach of quantifying groundwater is possibly due to governance historically associated with three different nations: Mexico, the Republic of Texas, and the United States. Each state follows a different approach. For example, Louisiana is working on a public participation approach to groundwater management. Their goal is long-term sustainability of aquifers, but they include consideration of economic and ecological concerns. Groundwater concerns include water level declines, land subsidence, and salt water intrusion. In 1972, Kansas established groundwater management districts for the entire state. These districts issue groundwater permits based upon priority dates. Since 1912, New Mexico's jurisdiction and quantification of groundwater resided with the State Engineer, but the Interstate Stream Commission developed stakeholder-based regional and state water plans from a 2003 legislative directive. In 1980 Arizona's legislation required a state agency to answer the question of how much groundwater Arizona has in order for the state to develop rules and a comprehensive management approach to solve their groundwater overdrafting issues. Since 1909, Oregon water rights, considered state-owned, state-controlled, and appropriated by date, are connected to land ownership. Groundwater availability is not calculated directly but is quantified by the state determining whether the aquifer is fully appropriated or, if not, from water level declines and resulting determination if the basin users are withdrawing more water than is being recharged to the aquifer.

 


The 2007 Ground Water Summit