2007 Ground Water Summit |
Even with the maintenance the wells should receive, often record keeping of maintenance and performance testing is even more scarce than the maintenance itself. Just as a vehicle history can tell you when it is time to repair or replace your car, proper records can make the difference between a well that can be repaired versus one that must be abandoned.
The objective of this study was to determine both the minimal and optimal levels and methods of record keeping. Finite and meager budgets are the reality that exists for record keeping related to water well management. With this in mind, traditional record keeping methods, along with more advanced methods, and third party monitoring and service were analyzed. Case studies including specific examples of downfalls, in addition to successes, in the fitness, repair, and management of wells, related to record keeping, and analysis of records are examined.
Ethan O. Weikel, P.G., Kleinfelder Inc. Mr. Weikel received a B.S. in Structural Geology from the College of William and Mary in Virginia. At William and Mary, his focus was also on sedimentology and stratigraphy, and included field mapping for the U.S. Geological Survey in the Virginia Piedmont Province. Mr. Weikel continued his work in northern California with an emphasis on hydrogeology and water resources, where he received his licensure as a Professional Geologist. Mr. Weikel is currently residing in Maryland, working as a Project Manager and Hydrogeologist, focusing on hydrogeologic assessment and water resources management.