Wednesday, April 2, 2008 : 2:00 p.m.

Interactive Multi-Objective Inverse Groundwater Modelling – Incorporating Subjective Knowledge and Conceptual Uncertainty

Albert Valocchi, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Abhishek Singh, INTERA, Inc., Douglas D. Walker, Illinois State Water Survey and Barbara Minsker, Univ of IL Dept Civil & Envr Eng

This paper addresses the important issue of uncertainty assessment for predictions obtained from an interactive multi-objective groundwater inverse framework (also proposed by the authors). This framework is based on an interactive multi-objective genetic algorithm (IMOGA) and considers subjective user preferences in addition to quantitative calibration measures such as calibration errors and regularization to solve the groundwater inverse problem. Predictive uncertainty analysis for the IMOGA consists of assessing the uncertainty in the optimal transmissivity fields, and the impact this uncertainty has on predictions. To do this, a multi-level sampling approach is proposed, incorporating uncertainty in both large-scale trends and the small-scale stochastic variability.

The multiple solutions found by the IMOGA are considered alternative models of the large-scale structure of the transmissivity field. The large-scale uncertainty is modeled using a statistical approach where calibration error, regularization, and the expert’s subjective preferences for different parameter fields are incorporated in the likelihood of a given transmissivity field. Small-scale uncertainty is considered to be conditioned on the large-scale trend and correlated with a specified covariance structure. A state-of-the-art stochastic simulation algorithm called ‘direct sequential simulation’ is used to ensure that the local mean structure of the large-scale trend is preserved, thus maintaining the solutions’ calibration errors within bounds. The prediction model is run for the resulting realizations to obtain the distribution of predictions, which are then combined using model averaging approaches such as GLUE (generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation) and MLBMA (maximum likelihood Bayesian model averaging).

This methodology has been applied to a field-scale case study based on the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) situated in Carlsbad, NM. Results indicate that taking expert judgment into consideration leads to more conservative solutions and allows the expert to compensate for some of the lack of data and model simplifications introduced in the formulation of the problem.

Albert Valocchi, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Albert J. Valocchi is a Professor and Associate Head in the Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Univ. of Illinois. His research interest is Modeling the fate and transport of reactive contaminants in the subsurface environment, numerical methods; aquifer remediation and mathematical modeling applications in environmental and hydrological sciences.

Abhishek Singh, INTERA, Inc. Abhishek Singh received his B.E. in Civil Engineering from the Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India (2001), and his Masters (2003) and PhD (2007) in Environmental Engineering from the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He currently works as an Environmental Scientist in the Water Resources Division of INTERA Inc., Austin, TX. His research interests lie in the analysis, modeling and optimization of complex large-scale environmental systems, particularly water-resources problems. He has a keen interest in stochastic analysis, data assimilation as well as data-mining and machine-learning techniques.


2008 Ground Water Summit