Ground Water Modeling: A Dangerously Uninformed Tool for Complex Decisions Under Uncertainty?

Wednesday, April 22, 2009: 2:20 p.m.
Coronado I (Hilton Tucson El Conquistador Golf & Tennis Resort )
Gregory J. Ruskauff , Intera Inc., Las Vegas, NV
Nicole M. DeNovio , Golder Associates Inc., Redmond, WA
Srikanta Mishra , Intera Inc., Austin, TX
Bruce Crowe , Battelle Memorial Institute
One of the major values of ground-water modeling is that it can be used to test hypotheses and simulate consequences of management decisions.  However, models for some environmental problems involve complex processes that are impossible to fully quantify or measure, and the problem becomes more difficult when uncertainty is considered.  Because we need to develop parameters for these complex models our ability to fully inform the users of the effects and limitations of modeling uncertainty can be limited. 

 

One of limitations of modeling uncertainty on decisions is the use of so-called "conservative" assumptions and parameterizations widely used in model development because the data needed to support and analyze model requirements may be difficult to obtain.  Assumptions made for modeling efficiency or to compensate for a pervasive lack of data, providing “worse or worst” results, can distort quantification of uncertainty and compromise the use of model for making useful decisions.

 

Depending on setting and the decision parameter uncertainty can be of significant consequence, and can be addressed through relatively well-known methods.  Consideration of more complex forms of uncertainty – conceptual model uncertainty – has created a new problem in that it is not always obvious what uncertainty permissible with the data actually has an impact on the decision.  Application of techniques for expressing the consequences of this uncertainty to decision makers are still in their infancy. 

 

Uncertainty analysis, whether parameter or conceptual, that focuses on changes to model outcomes that are not informed by measured data may be more useful to decision makers than a general “uncertainty analysis”.  These types of approaches begin to address the impact of uncertainty on decision making, which is a very real value of modeling.  Clearly communicating these uncertainties, including both the strengths and weakness of these modeling efforts, to decision makers is a continuing challenge.