Findings from the study indicate that it is possible to develop direct and indirect aquifer recharge projects to improve UFA water levels and provide opportunities for additional groundwater withdrawals in the area. Direct aquifer recharge (e.g., recharge wells) is most optimally located in coastal areas where the native aquifer water quality is poor and regulatory requirements are less stringent than more inland areas. Indirect aquifer recharge (e.g., rapid infiltration basins) would be most beneficially located in areas where the surficial sands are thick and a good connection to the underlying UFA exists. Depending on location, potentially up to 90 percent of recharged water quantities could be used as drawdown mitigation offset for future additional groundwater withdrawals. Estimated costs are comparable to costs of other planned alternative water supply projects. Results from this study can be used by water suppliers to determine if these concepts can be incorporated into their water supply plans. More site specific assessments including aquifer metals mobilization studies are needed, however.
See more of: Policy/Regulatory/Economics
See more of: Topical Sessions