Despite its overall success, WILK experienced some expensive failures in its early endeavors related to drilling dry or salty boreholes, primarily as a result of making location decisions based on questionable geologic advice received from local geologic consultants and government agencies. Fortunately, WILK has since found volunteers with hydrogeology/water resource engineering backgrounds to provide technical review and guidance for its projects. This technical resource has already helped WILK focus its efforts on more sustainable projects. For example, based on technical reviewer recommendations, no additional funds were spent for pump testing a well with marginal water quality, and participation in a 50-km long water pipeline project was suspended over pipeline design concerns. Although these hard decisions were disappointing to those hoping to be served by these projects, the funds were instead invested in other viable projects.
Proceeding forward, WILK now conducts a detailed scientifically based assessment of each new water project with respect to its probability to succeed given the site hydrogeology and related engineering considerations. This approach will ensure that only those water projects with the lowest risk/maximum potential for success will be developed in the future.
See more of: International and Developing Countries
See more of: Topical Sessions