A 2011 United States Supreme Court decision addressed this issue in the context of the Yellowstone River Compact. (Montana v. Wyoming, No. 137, Orig.). This compact includes a provision protecting rights existing at the time of ratification. The Court ruled that irrigation methods in place at the time of the compact could be improved within the state’s compact rights, regardless of any reduction to flows caused by such changes.
In another 2011 development, the State of Colorado took two measures in the Arkansas River Basin pertaining to irrigation systems improvements. First, Colorado promulgated Compact Rules Governing Improvements to Surface Water Irrigation System and, second, entered into an agreement with the State of Kansas to change the Hydrologic-Institutional Model, the tool used to measure compact compliance, in order to recognize improved efficiencies of systems supplied with ground water. Both measures were designed to ensure that return flows used in Kansas at the time of the compact would not be consumed by improved water irrigation practices in Colorado.
See more of: Western Groundwater Issues
See more of: Topical Sessions