Tuesday, June 24, 2008 : 10:40 a.m.

Evaluation of the Hydrologic Effects of Oxygen Injection for Biostimulation in an Upper Glacial Aquifer on Long Island

Matthew J. O'Neil, PE1, Jeffery R. Parillo1, David B. Terry1, William J. Ryan2, Theodore O. Leissing2, Sean R. Carter, PE3, Gardiner W. Cross4 and Amen M. Omorogbe, PE4, (1)GEI Consultants Inc., (2)KeySpan Corporation, A National Grid Company, (3)Matrix Environmental Technologies, (4)NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation

Oxygen injection technology is being successfully implemented to increase aerobic biological activity and significantly reduce concentrations at the toe of a one mile long groundwater plume emanating from a former manufactured gas plant (MGP) site.  The interim remedial measure (IRM) was designed to reduce concentrations within the plume prior to discharge into a tidally influenced tributary of the Great South Bay while a source containment remedy was implemented.  This study was conducted to evaluate the potential for O2 injection to alter groundwater flow conditions in the vicinity of the injection wells. 

The success of the IRM promoted additional interest for expansion of the technology to other areas of the plume.  However, increases in concentrations of volatile organic compounds and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater outside of the original plume boundary raised concerns that the oxygen injection may be inadvertently diverting the groundwater plume beyond the limits of the treatment zone.  A joint study was undertaken by KeySpan Corporation, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to address these concerns.  The study included a review of existing physical groundwater parameter data and treatment system operational data; collection of continuous water level measurements over a fourteen day period in forty-eight monitoring wells; and the collection and chemical analysis of soil, groundwater, and soil vapor samples from the treatment zone.  Groundwater and soil vapor samples were collected over two periods, normal system operations and following a five day period when the system was taken out of operation.  A comparison of the data for each system condition, as well as a comparison to historic performance and monitoring data, is evaluated and presented.  The study concluded that the oxygen injection did not alter groundwater flow conditions in the vicinity of the injection wells.

Matthew J. O'Neil, PE, GEI Consultants Inc. Mr. O’Neil is a graduate of the United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering. He is a practicing professional engineer and project manager with ten years of environmental consulting and remediation experience in the petroleum and utility industries. In addition, he has ten years of leadership and organizational experience as an officer in the U.S. Army and Army National Guard. His specialties include remedial engineering, construction oversight, and groundwater remedial systems design.

Jeffery R. Parillo, GEI Consultants Inc. Mr. Parillo is a graduate of the University of Connecticut with a B.S. in Civil Engineering. He is an engineer that has four years of experience in the utility industry. His specialties include construction oversight, environmental sampling, and installation and monitoring of oxygen injection systems.


[ Manuscript ] Manuscript

2008 NGWA Conference on Eastern Regional Ground Water Issues