![]() |
Remediation of Abandoned Mine Lands |
This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages the various passive treatment approaches and is an introduction to the wide range of remediation design options available to practitioners of passive treatment. Rather than propose “cookbook” designs, the paper details a recommended staged-approach of laboratory-, bench-, and pilot-scale testing which has been shown to increase the likelihood of a successful design, especially for MIW with complex chemistry.
Additional Key Words: Constructed wetlands, acid mine drainage, heavy metals, sulfate reducing bioreactors
James J. Gusek, PE, Golder Associates Inc. Mr. Gusek, P.E. is a Senior Consultant with Golder Associates, Inc. He specializes in mine closure, mine land reclamation, and design of passive treatment systems for mine influenced water. Since 1987, his work with acid rock drainage prevention and passive water treatment has included dozens of projects throughout the U.S. and internationally. He serves on the mitigation committee of the Acid Drainage Technology Initiative - Metal Mining Sector. He is a founding member and former president of the Denver Chapter of Engineers Without Borders. He graduated from the Colorado School of Mines in 1973 with a B.Sc. in Mining Engineering.