From TMDLs to PRBs Using Groundwater Models to Evaluate Nitrogen Management Strategies

Tuesday, June 7, 2016: 10:45 a.m.
Dan O’Rourke, PG , CDM Smith, Edison, NJ
Mary Anne Taylor , CDM Smith, Woodbury, NY
Matthew Gamache, P.E. , CDM Smith, Cambridge, MA
Cannon Silver, PE , CDM Smith, Edison, NJ

Nitrogen loading to groundwater from surface activities has caused degradation of aquifer and surface water quality. Major research programs are in place to evaluate and manage nitrogen loading to regional estuaries including Chesapeake Bay. In Suffolk County, New York, an ambitious Comprehensive Plan was published in 2015 that addresses groundwater and surface water quality impairments resulting from nitrogen loading.

Groundwater models are being utilized to better understand the impact of nitrogen reduction strategies such as sanitary sewering. As part of a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for nitrogen for the Forge River Estuary, nitrogen loading models have been coupled with groundwater models to simulate the fate and transport of parcel-specific nitrogen loading. Where development opportunities exist within Suffolk County, groundwater modeling analyses were completed to evaluate the impact of housing density on shallow water supply wells. Utilizing groundwater models allows for a better understanding of the impact of historic land uses on aquifer nitrogen concentrations and ultimate discharge to receptors (supply wells or surface water).

Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) are designed to intercept and remediate groundwater contaminant plumes. PRBs have generally proven to be an effective and sustainable technology, with recent applications demonstrating their effectiveness at reducing elevated concentrations of nitrate in groundwater. Groundwater models are being used to help design PRBs in Suffolk County by evaluating the zone of capture and anticipated nitrate load reduction.

In both of these applications, and in most groundwater-based analyses, the slow movement of groundwater and the highly dynamic nature of aquifer withdrawals for water supply result in very long travel times and indirect pathways from the source(s) of the nitrogen loading to discharge points. For this reason, it is important municipalities and regulators understand the value groundwater models provide in making major infrastructure decisions.

Dan O’Rourke, PG, CDM Smith, Edison, NJ
Daniel O’Rourke, PG, is a hydrogeologist and project manager located in CDM Smith’s Edison, New Jersey office. He has been with CDM since 2002 and has worked on various water resources projects pertaining to groundwater and surface water quality and supply. He has a B.S. degree in Earth and Environmental Sciences from Lehigh University, an M.S. degree in Geosciences/Hydrogeology from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, and an M.S. degree in Environmental Engineering from Manhattan College.


Mary Anne Taylor, CDM Smith, Woodbury, NY
Mary Anne Taylor, P.E. is an Associate located in Camp Dresser & McKee’s Woodbury office. She holds a Bachelors degree in Civil Engineering and a Masters degree in Environmental Engineering, both from Manhattan College. She is CDM’s Project Manager for the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, as well as for the previous groundwater model development and application projects. E-Mail: taylormb@cdm.com.


Matthew Gamache, P.E., CDM Smith, Cambridge, MA
Mr. Gamache is a water resources engineer who specializes in subsurface hydrologic and contaminant transport modeling. These models have been used to assess groundwater flow paths, travel times, and contaminant concentrations for litigation support, delineation of drinking water protection zones, and design of groundwater remediation systems. He received a M.S. from the University of Michigan and a B.S. from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.


Cannon Silver, PE, CDM Smith, Edison, NJ
TBA