Vertical Head and Hydraulic Gradient Profiles for Improved Flow System Conceptual and Numerical Modelling
Hydrogeologic (or hydrostratigraphic) units (HGUs) are foundational elements of conceptual and numerical models of groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Adequate representation of groundwater flow processes requires that HGUs be delineated on the basis of hydraulic information. However, in practice, delineation of HGUs is often based on data that is indirect with respect to hydraulic properties or blended hydraulic data. Fifteen detailed and depth discrete (i.e., high-resolution) Westbay® multilevel systems (MLSs) have been installed at contaminated, sedimentary rock field sites in Wisconsin, California, and Ontario and used to collect head profiles over multiyear periods. These MLSs were installed to maximum depths between 90 and 260 m and include an average of 3.3 monitoring zones per 10 m. Here we show that high resolution head profiles collected from fractured sedimentary rocks are highly repeatable, indicate the vertical position and thickness of hydraulic conductivity/connectivity contrasts, and provide insight into flow system conditions. In addition, the high resolution head profiles from the Wisconsin site were examined along cross-sections and used to identify laterally extensive contrasts in hydraulic conductivity/connectivity forming the basis for a HGU conceptual model for the site. Comparison to detailed core and geophysical data showed that these laterally extensive hydraulic conductivity/connectivity contrasts were strongly associated with important sequence stratigraphic units but not with lithostratigraphy, which is commonly relied on for positioning well screens. Work is in progress to represent this HGU conceptualization in a three-dimensional FEFLOW groundwater flow model. The high resolution head and vertical gradient field data will be used to validate the model to improve simulation of groundwater flow paths that will support separate transport modeling efforts. This study shows that the position and thickness of units with contrasting hydraulic conductivity/connectivity would not be evident if the density of monitoring zones in the MLSs had been that of conventional profiles.