Pilot-Scale Biorestoration of Groundwater at a Uranium ISR Site by H2 Injection

Wednesday, April 14, 2010: 2:30 p.m.
Continental A (Westin Tabor Center, Denver)
Jose Cabezas , Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX
Yaneth Gamboa , Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX
Lee Clapp , Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX
Ron Grant , Uranium Resources Inc., Kingsville, TX
Dain McCoig , Uranium Resources Inc., Kingsville, TX
Craig Bartels , Uranium Resources Inc., Kingsville, TX
State and federal regulations require that groundwater at in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium mining operations be restored to pre-mining conditions. Industry-accepted groundwater restoration technologies such as reverse osmosis filtration require treatment of large amounts of water and may take several years to achieve restoration goals, and in some cases pre-mining conditions cannot be reached. In-situ biostimulation of indigenous iron- and sulfate reducing bacteria by injection of organic electron donors (e.g., ethanol, acetate, and lactate) to promote soluble uranium reduction and immobilization has been the subject of previous studies. However, injection of organic substrates has been observed to cause aquifer clogging near the injection point. In addition, U(VI) solubility may be enhanced through complexation with carbonate generated by organic carbon oxidation. An alternative approach that may overcome these problems involves the use of hydrogen as a reductant to promote microbial reduction and immobilization of U(VI) in situ. To test this approach, approximately 100,000 scf of compressed hydrogen gas was injected into a leached unconsolidated sand zone over two months at an ISR mining site. During this time groundwater was recirculated between injection and extraction wells (separated by 130 ft) at a rate of about 40 gpm and bromide was co-injected as a conservative tracer.  A well monitoring program has been executed since June 2009 to evaluate the performance of the hydrogen injection. Current results show that U(VI) has been reduced from 4.2 to 0.05 ppm in the area surrounding the injection well and to 2.0 ± 0.3 ppm in the area surrounding the extraction well and two intermediate monitoring wells. Other water quality changes near the injection well include significant decreases in concentrations of Mo, sulfate, Fe, Mn, bicarbonate, Ca, and Eh, and increases in pH, methane, and sulfide. Ongoing studies are evaluating the effective zone of influence of the hydrogen injection.
See more of: Uranium in Groundwater
See more of: Topical Sessions