Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Overlying the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville Shale UOG Development Areas

Tuesday, April 25, 2017: 9:15 a.m.
Peter B. McMahon, Ph.D. , USGS, Denver, CO
Jeannie Barlow, PhD , Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Jackson, MS
Mark A. Engle, Ph.D. , Eastern Energy Resources Science Center, USGS, Reston, VA
Kenneth Belitz , National Water Quality Assessment Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Boston, MA
Patricia Ging , U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, TX
Andrew Hunt , U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
Yousif Kharaka , U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
Bryant C. Jurgens , U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA
Roland Tollett , U.S. Geological Survey, Ruston, LA
Timothy Kresse , U.S. Geological Survey, Little Rock, AR

Groundwater overlying the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville Shale unconventional oil and gas (UOG) development areas was analyzed for chemical, isotopic, and groundwater-age tracers to evaluate sources of selected hydrocarbons in groundwater. Methane isotopes and hydrocarbon gas compositions indicate most of the methane detected in these areas was biogenic and produced by the CO2 reduction pathway, not from thermogenic shale gas. Two samples contained methane from the fermentation pathway that could be associated with oil or fuel degradation based on their co-occurrence with fuel hydrocarbons such as ethylbenzene, butane, and MTBE. Benzene was detected at low concentrations (<0.15 µg/L), but at relatively high frequencies (2.4–13.3% of samples), in the study areas. Eight of nine samples containing benzene had mean groundwater ages >2500 years, indicating the benzene was from subsurface sources. One sample from the Fayetteville study area contained benzene that might be from a surface source associated with UOG production activities based on its mean groundwater age (10±2.4 years) and proximity to UOG wells. Overall, our results suggest groundwater in the Fayetteville study area was the most vulnerable to potential surface sources of contamination based on estimates of mean groundwater age and fractions of post-1950s water in the samples.

Peter B. McMahon, Ph.D., USGS, Denver, CO
Peter B. McMahon, Ph.D., research hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Colorado Water Science Center, has more than 30 years of experience conducting groundwater-quality studies across the United States and is currently studying the effects of energy development on groundwater quality in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Louisiana, and Texas. He earned his master’s degree in geology from the University of Texas at Austin and his Ph.D. in geology from the University of South Carolina.


Jeannie Barlow, PhD, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Jackson, MS
Research Hydrologist


Mark A. Engle, Ph.D., Eastern Energy Resources Science Center, USGS, Reston, VA
Mark Engle is a research geochemist in the Eastern Energy Resources Science Center.


Kenneth Belitz, National Water Quality Assessment Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Boston, MA
Ken Belitz is a Supervisory Research Scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey. He received a B.S. in Geology from Binghamton University and a Ph.D. in Applied Hydrogeology from Stanford University.


Patricia Ging, U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, TX
Hydrologist


Andrew Hunt, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
Research Geologist


Yousif Kharaka, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
Emeritus Research Hydrologist


Bryant C. Jurgens, U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA
U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologist


Roland Tollett, U.S. Geological Survey, Ruston, LA
Hydrologist


Timothy Kresse, U.S. Geological Survey, Little Rock, AR
Hydrologist