Stream Methane Monitoring for Evaluating Groundwater Impacts Associated with Shale Gas Development

Tuesday, May 6, 2014: 10:50 a.m.
Confluence A (Westin Denver Downtown)
Victor Heilweil , UT Water Science Center, USGS, Salt Lake City, UT
D. Kip Solomon , Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Dennis Risser , PA Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, New Cumberland, PA
Thomas Darrah , School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Scott Hynek , Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Paul Grieve , Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

The baseflow of gaining streams can provide an integrated chemical signal for groundwater systems. It may be possible to evaluate impacts from unconventional gas development by sampling such streams. The stream-reach methane (CH4) mass balance method is one approach for establishing baseline groundwater quality prior to development and detecting subsequent contamination. This method has the advantage of using gaining streams to monitor groundwater quality at the watershed scale, rather than the point scale provided by monitoring wells. A tracer injection in Nine-Mile Creek, Utah, showed the downstream persistence of CH4 for over 1.5 km downstream, with an “apparent” (atmospheric loss plus any microbial degradation) gas transfer velocity of 4.5 m/d. In West Bear Creek, North Carolina, injected CH4 persisted for more than 2.5 km downstream. A noble gas (krypton) was also injected in order to separate atmospheric CH4 loss from any microbial degradation. Comparison of the gas transfer velocities determined from CH4 and Kr will indicate whether microbial degradation is a significant process (work is in progress). These methods are now being tested in pilot-scale studies in the Marcellus shale-gas play of Pennsylvania. Preliminary reconnaissance sampling has yielded stream methane concentrations of up to 70 ppb (background is generally < 2 ppb). Follow-up work along Sugar Run using an uncalibrated mass balance with transport modeling suggests that inflowing groundwater may have CH4 concentrations of up to 3000 ppb; sampling along Tunkhannock Creek showed 13C-CH4 enrichment (from -55 to -39 permil), indicating a possible thermogenic source. These results illustrate the utility of the method for locating areas of anomalously high stream CH4, but more detailed assessment is needed. Future work in both streams includes additional 13C-CH4 and noble gas fingerprinting to evaluate methane sources (biogenic or thermogenic) and tracer injections for quantifying groundwater inflow and gas transfer velocities. 

Victor Heilweil, UT Water Science Center, USGS, Salt Lake City, UT

Victor Heilweil received a B.S. in geology from Duke University, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in geology from the University of Utah. He serves as both Ground Water Specialist and Research Hydrologist for the USGS Utah Water Science Center. Current work is focused on natural and artificial groundwater recharge to bedrock aquifers, utilizing environmental and dissolved-gas tracers. In addition to groundwater studies in the western U.S., Heilweil is also involved with projects in developing nations (Latin America, Africa) and serves as treasurer of the International Association of Hydrogeologists U.S. National Chapter.

D. Kip Solomon, Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Professor

Dennis Risser, PA Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, New Cumberland, PA
Dennis Risser is the USGS Pennsylvania Water Science Center Groundwater Specialist.

Thomas Darrah, School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Professor

Scott Hynek, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Post Doctoral Scholar

Paul Grieve, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Graduate Student