Monitoring Optimization: Lean Approaches and Lessons

Monday, December 3, 2018: 2:20 p.m.
N117 (Las Vegas Convention Center)
Jay Piper, CEM , Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Henderson, NV
Steve Martz, CEP, Six Sigma Black Belt , Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Englewood, CO
Christina Hong, PE , Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Los Angeles, CA
Kevin Sullivan, PE , Remediation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, CA
Curt Russell, PE , Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Needles, CA

The USEPA has promoted Lean and Six Sigma approaches for a decade. Lean concepts and approaches provide a framework for monitoring program optimization, quality, and cost saving initiatives at complex sites. A set of groundwater and surface water monitoring programs evolved and improved over seven years during site characterization supporting RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI), interim measure (IM) monitoring, and monitoring during remedy design. The Lean concept of 8 Wastes (defects, overproduction, waiting, non-utilized talent, transportation, inventory, motion and extra-processing) helped focus on areas for improvement. Examples of initiatives that reduced these “wastes” will be presented. Lean tools were used to support root cause analyses, and to select improvement projects. Ten percent or greater annual cost savings were achieved while defects reduced to zero.

Improvement projects included modifications to reduce sampling frequencies and depth intervals, and trials that led to approval of low flow methods for groundwater sampling and automated water level data collection. Constraints were removed by justifying analytical methods with longer holding times, and more ergonomic or efficient field methods. Visual management approaches such as one-page snapshots were used to support consolidation and reduced frequency of extensive bound reports. The cost of non-compliance was avoided by modifying schedules and access procedures to protect cultural and biological resources. Mobilization costs and the environmental footprint of monitoring were reduced by cross training IM operations staff to support all monitoring activities, a measure that also increased responsiveness to short term data collection needs.

Lean tools such as the Pareto diagram help select improvement projects aligned with cost/benefit considerations, and explain why some initiatives succeed, and other initiatives don’t fully achieve intended results. Lessons and suggestions will be shared for approaches in monitoring programs to identify improvement projects that reduce defects, lower cost, and increase performance against any site metrics.

Jay Piper, CEM, Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Henderson, NV
Geologist and project manager for Jacobs, working 25 years for Federal and Industrial client environmental site characterization and remediation.


Steve Martz, CEP, Six Sigma Black Belt, Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Englewood, CO
Quality manager for Jacobs with over 25 years experience


Christina Hong, PE, Global Environmental Solutions, Jacobs, Los Angeles, CA
Program manager and senior project manager for Jacobs with global experience spanning over 25 years.


Kevin Sullivan, PE, Remediation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, CA
Program manager for Pacific Gas and Electric Company with more than 25 years management and technical environmental remediation experience.


Curt Russell, PE, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Needles, CA
Engineer and project manager with more than 25 years experience managing energy transmission and environmental response and remediation.