2016 Groundwater Week: Alphabetical Content Listing
Achieving Energy Savings and More with VFDs
Larry R. Stanley
Advances in Groundwater Science and Practice
William Alley, Ph.D.
ASR Generation: Generating Green Energy During ASR Injection
Kent Madison
A Technology Platform to Harness Speed and Certainty in Groundwater Remediation
Dan Nunez
The presentation will include a case study featuring a Midwest manufacturing facility, which utilized the liquid activated carbon solution coupled with a slow release electron donor to control migration of a TCA and TCE plume offsite. Long-term performance data (18 months) showing up to a 99% reduction in contaminant concentrations was observed and will be discussed.
In addition, two projects located in the Northwest will be discussed - one an active service station where several technologies had previously been utilized for the treatment of MTBE, BTEX, and TPH, but had also fallen short of remedial goals. The second site consisted of mixed plumes from both a former gas station and dry cleaners. The site was a few city blocks away from a redevelopment project for the same client and there was concern regarding off-site migration due to the operation of a pump and treat system. With groundwater contamination as the primary concern at both sites and time/cost-sensitive deadlines rapidly approaching, a fast and permanent remediation strategy was required. Performance data and the results will be outlined.
Availability of Groundwater Modeling Software and Applications at the U.S. Geological Survey
William L. Cunningham
Environmental Noise Impact Assessment and Mitigation for Water Well Drilling
Donald Behrens
Typical sound levels of water well drilling equipment exceed 100 dBA and 110 dBC during normal operations. Noise surveys, including detail frequency spectra measurements of all equipment operating on the drill site, are required for accurate computer modeling of the predicted off-site noise level impacts. The utilization of a beamforming array for acoustical imagining surveying of the water well drilling noise sources allows for improved source noise level and frequency identification.
The establishment and documentation of the drill site’s ambient sound levels prior to the well drilling operations are required for the compliance verification and noise mitigation system design.
Computer noise prediction modeling meeting ISO 9613 Standards is utilized to evaluate off-site drilling noise impacts and to establish the noise mitigation systems requirements to meet regulatory compliance levels. For accurate noise impact modeling, the drill site and adjacent area’s topography, land cover, and structures are modeled the account for noise blocking, reflection and absorption at any given location.
With the development of site specific noise impact models, noise mitigation systems can be evaluated to determine the most cost effective system(s) required to meet regulatory compliance levels.
In designing temporary noise mitigation systems for water well drilling operations, many factors need to be considered, including the mitigation system design for low frequency noise. Other considerations include access and egress to the equipment for operator’s safety, maintaining line of sight for the operators, minimization of heat gain, and maintenance of air quality and worker noise exposure.
Groundwater Modeling Analyses to Inform Aquifer Management Decisions in the Southern Nebraska Panhandle
Thad Kuntz, PG
How to Obtain and Leverage Real-Time Data Access to Reduce Risk
Eric Paulk
Water level and water quality data can be difficult and costly to retrieve and analyze, especially when it requires a trip to the field to manually collect readings from the instrument. Additionally, the task of sorting, manipulating, and formatting the data once its collected can be extremely time-consuming. With this method, it’s likely that critical information isn’t gathered and analyzed until well after it would have been most useful. This workshop will be a live demonstration of how to utilize a data services platform in order to gain access to real-time data. Participants will learn ways to simplify the task of filtering data for important results, including rapidly narrowing data by location, parameter, user tags, or project. Participants will also learn how to use customizable alarm notifications to limit potential problems and minimize damages when issues do arise.
Learning Objectives
- Analyze and access your data in a timely manner to limit potential problems, and minimize damages when issues do arise.
- Identify ways to spend less time manipulating data into your desired format.
- Keep track of all your projects and instruments in a central location.
Initial Results of an Assessment of Private Well Risks and Vulnerabilities
Steven D. Wilson
Modeling the Potential for MNA of a Uranium Plume at a Fractured Rock Site
Jason R. House, CG, PG
New Groundwater Insights and Practical Advantages of Monitoring Pumping with Wellntel Systems
Joseph Fillingham, Ph.D.
Pumping vs. Air-Lifting to Maintain Injection Well Efficiency
John D. Bonsangue, PG
Software for the Design of Optimal Multivariate Groundwater Quality Monitoring Networks on a GIS Environment
Jorge Aceves De Alba
The objective of this research was to develop a software that uses a Geographic Information System (GIS) supported by a methodology that employs geostatistical tools and the static Kalman Filter to define optimal multivariate groundwater quality monitoring networks. Within the specialized literature, there are different approaches to define monitoring networks, those that include GIS usually require the application of geostatistical analyses. The adopted methodology employs the Kalman filter as the estimation method within the optimization procedure. Originally, the application of this methodology was carried out in a series of routines written in the Fortran programming language which complicates the implementation for a non-specialized user.
The software presented in this paper provides a single free-access tool that allows to facilitate the design of optimal monitoring networks with the capability of verifying final results on a friendly-user environment. It has also the capability to assign weights to each monitoring site based on the correlation and distribution of analyzed variables.
As a final result, the spatial location of the optimal set of monitoring wells is displayed along with the level of importance of each one according to the amount of information it provides in the estimation of the monitored variable(s).
The Groundwater Visibility Initiative: Integrating Groundwater and Surface Water Management
William Alley, Ph.D.
In many parts of the world, the failure to manage groundwater in an integrated, sustainable way could have severe consequences. Depleted and/or contaminated water reserves contribute to regional conflicts and create public health hazards. Subsidence causes significant damage to critical infrastructure such as roads and levees. Entire economies, based on water dependent agriculture and industry, are at risk.
In April 2016, AWRA and NGWA convened 24 water experts from across the United States and Canada in a day-long Groundwater Visibility Initiative workshop in Denver, Colorado. This seminal event sought to discuss the best way to elevate groundwater’s status in the international discourse on water policy, governance, and management by crafting recommendations for action.
The attendees tackled an agenda consisting of provocative talks by recognized experts, panel discussions, and breakout sessions. They articulated ways to better integrate groundwater into integrated water resources management and incorporate it into policies for agriculture, energy, environment, land-use planning, and urban development. This presentation will summarize the workshop findings and recommendations.
The Missing Ingredient to Healthy Farming: Understanding Groundwater Supply
Nick Hayes, CTO
Variable Density Flow: Are Equivalent Freshwater Heads Necessary or Misleading?
Klaus Udo Weyer, Ph.D., PG, PHG
Well Asset Management: Not Just for Utility Water Supply
Stuart A. Smith, CGWP
Well deficiencies or failures can be hard to detect in a timely fashion. However, current or potential issues can be detected and tracked with available methods, permitting preventive maintenance actions and treatment.
A feature that wells and wellfield arrays have in common with other engineered systems is the benefit provided by good design, material choices, and expert construction. Thus, a total life-cycle asset management program for “wild” wells involves planning, design, baseline documentation of performance, environmental condition and performance tracking to establish trends and make decisions over time, and planning service events proactively based on that tracking.
This presentation will focus on these points:
- Some challenges that wells face
- Planning that optimizes life-cycle cost management
- Maintenance monitoring recommendations (more than water level and flow rate, but please do that, too)
- Integrating the “wild” wellfield into your total asset management program.
A final point is that such asset management of wells is as viable for small systems with one or two wells as it is for large municipal systems. The tasks and goals are the same, but can be managed under time and budget constraints. In fact, small systems, without financial buffers for major service or capital replacement events, need such a well maintenance program most of all.
Groundwater-source utilities are “well-advised” to implement such designed proactive programs, including training, as an alternative to delegating well service in a reactive way (when performance declines or components fail) to well service companies.